Here's what happens when there's a short-circuit in the ol' communication chain somwhere.
Let's say you're a construction worker, doing renovation on a high school, and you just happen to knock a sprinkler head off. Okay, no problem, we'll call the fire alarm company and tell them not to send the fire department if they get an alarm--and trust me, they will. . .well, the alarm company isn't listening well, and thinks you said "Don't send them on a SYSTEM TROUBLE alarm." So, "Don't send them on an alarm" becomes "Don't send them on a trouble alarm", which morphs into "Jeffersonville Fire Department, District 2, have an active fire alarm at 2315 Allison Lane, Jeffersonville High School, cross streets 10th and Meadowlark, alarm company advising a general fire alarm, your box 235.". . .
The Chief sounded kinda annoyed on the radio. Can't say I blame him. . .
Showing posts with label random. Show all posts
Showing posts with label random. Show all posts
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Monday, April 5, 2010
Let's Talk Politics!, or: Fools Shine On
So the primary's coming up. Oh joy! Once again we will go to the polls to choose which candidates are worthy enough to face off in the November generals. Anymore, voting is like choosing between the lesser of multiple evils. In the primaries, you have, say, three Democrats--a raging progressive, a "blue dog", and a Democrat In Name Only--and three Republicans--a raging conservative, a moderate, and a Republican In Name Only. In the primaries you have one of those--we'll say the raging progressive Democrat and the moderate Republican--and a bevy of independents and third-party candidates who know they don't stand a snowball's chance in Hell of being elected and yet try anyway, just to say they can.
Voting is like playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun--you're always gonna get hurt in the end. In 2008 I flipped a coin to determine who I would vote for. Obama was heads, and McCain was tails. I flipped the coin because I KNEW we were screwed either way; I couldn't decide how I wanted to be screwed, so I busted out our first president and let him help me. Mr. Washington landed on heads.
There are a whole cornucopia of third parties out there--Libertarian, Reform, Socialist, Green, I could go on. And there's always a bunch of independents running. But they seem to have difficulty getting elected, because anymore the only way to get elected is by associating with one of the two major parties. A third party or independent candidate may have some darn good ideas, but if they're not democrat or republican they're not going anywhere.
And anymore, running for politics isn't much different from wrestling--lots of mildly entertaining trash talk and mud slinging. There is no such thing as a civil campaign anymore. There's dirt digging and character assassination coming from every direction. I've heard of candidates hiring private detectives to spy on their opponent and check their past to find something, anything, to discredit them. Is this what it's come down to? You can't run on an honest campaign, so you have your private eye dig up some dirt, and you use the guy's 1975 public drunkenness arrest against him? They'll use your family against you, too--one candidate said his opponent was immoral because he tolerated his son's being gay. (In both cases, the candidates who dug up that dirt lost, one quite exponentially) And in some cases, a candidate has had his opponent killed.
And the real sad part is, we the people let this go on. We would let the candidates engage in a guerrilla war against each other if it got that far--and trust me, it will. We have a political system dominated by two major groups--in fact, the system is biased towards them--where third party and independent candidates are destined to fail, where everyone involved either does anything possible to make the other guy look bad, or lose, because let's face it, we don't seem to like a clean, decent campaign anymore.
I'm going to run for politics someday. That's for certain. I just hope everything's changed by them. And if not, I suppose I'll keep my boxing gloves handy. . .
Voting is like playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun--you're always gonna get hurt in the end. In 2008 I flipped a coin to determine who I would vote for. Obama was heads, and McCain was tails. I flipped the coin because I KNEW we were screwed either way; I couldn't decide how I wanted to be screwed, so I busted out our first president and let him help me. Mr. Washington landed on heads.
There are a whole cornucopia of third parties out there--Libertarian, Reform, Socialist, Green, I could go on. And there's always a bunch of independents running. But they seem to have difficulty getting elected, because anymore the only way to get elected is by associating with one of the two major parties. A third party or independent candidate may have some darn good ideas, but if they're not democrat or republican they're not going anywhere.
And anymore, running for politics isn't much different from wrestling--lots of mildly entertaining trash talk and mud slinging. There is no such thing as a civil campaign anymore. There's dirt digging and character assassination coming from every direction. I've heard of candidates hiring private detectives to spy on their opponent and check their past to find something, anything, to discredit them. Is this what it's come down to? You can't run on an honest campaign, so you have your private eye dig up some dirt, and you use the guy's 1975 public drunkenness arrest against him? They'll use your family against you, too--one candidate said his opponent was immoral because he tolerated his son's being gay. (In both cases, the candidates who dug up that dirt lost, one quite exponentially) And in some cases, a candidate has had his opponent killed.
And the real sad part is, we the people let this go on. We would let the candidates engage in a guerrilla war against each other if it got that far--and trust me, it will. We have a political system dominated by two major groups--in fact, the system is biased towards them--where third party and independent candidates are destined to fail, where everyone involved either does anything possible to make the other guy look bad, or lose, because let's face it, we don't seem to like a clean, decent campaign anymore.
I'm going to run for politics someday. That's for certain. I just hope everything's changed by them. And if not, I suppose I'll keep my boxing gloves handy. . .
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Health care reform. . .
My mom, AKA Grumpy Granny, posted a blog about her concerns about the health care reform. She asked me to comment, and because of its size, I opted to make my comment a separate blog post. Here goes!
One of the problems with this bill is that it took them a year to pass it, and it wasn't because they were trying to work out the kinks, it was because they were too busy playing their partisan games. But it's like Jules said, bipartisanship was a foregone conclusion irregardless.
The CBO has said this is actually going to reduce the deficit. That's good, I'm all for defecit reduction, but I don't like the way they're doing it. For starters, they're cutting funding to Medicare. They have millions of people who depend on Medicare, and millions more that will depend on it soon, and they're going to cut funding. I would have rather they kept the funding as-is, or maybe even increased it. A lot of people on Medicare are on fixed incomes, and can't afford regular insurance--pre-existing condition or not--on their income, so in my opinion, reducing the Medicare funding is only going to hurt them more than it's going to help, at least in the short term. I admit that I'm actually kinda in favor of taxpayer subsidy of health insurance for those who can't afford it, if anything because, being on VA benefits, the taxpayers subsidize my healthcare, so who am I to complain, right?, but it's also because at least I know my tax dollars are going for something good and not, say, research on the behavior of moose sperm that's frozen and thawed out. . .but the Medicare cuts take effect before the government subsidies do. What are they going to do in the interim?
I also have a problem with the individual mandate. They're going to force everyone to have a minimum level of coverage. Now, again, that's where the government subsidies come in, and I know that there's exceptions for people who, even with subsidies, still can't afford it, and I also know that my VA healthcare automatically satisfies the minimum coverage requirement, but I oppose it on principle--who is the government to tell me or the people I know that they MUST do something, or face a fine? And the fine's not going to cap at $750. No, the cap in the penalty for not having health insurance is $750 multiplied by the cost of living increase from Calendar Year 1992--which was 3.7%, if I remember right, meaning the actual cap is more like $2,775.
And there's the matter of requiring employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance, or face a penalty. In the present economic environment a lot of those busimesses are doing good to meet payroll; throwing this on them may well spell bankruptcy. And I don't remember seeing anything in the bill about government helping to fund employer-sponsored coverage, although I could be wrong on that. I did try to read the bill, but at a couple thousand pages of congressional gibberish it's hard. . .
Of course, the individual mandate and employer mandate don't kick in until 2014. Who's to say the ecomony's going to improve by then? I sure as hell hope it has but with everything that's gone on economically it's a very real possibility that it could be 2014 or beyond before we fully recover. I'm not trying to sound pessimistic, I'm honestly just trying to look at reality.
That's the other thing--why do most of the changes have to take effect in 2014? Who not 2010, or 2011? They're waiting too long to put everything in effect. Yeah, okay, the budgets for 2011-2013 are already in the works. . .MODIFY THEM! I'm pretty sure there's a way to modify budget forecasts like that so that the stuff can take effect at least in 2011.
Now, I did my research on single-payer health care, specifically the Kucinich bill that's been introduced every Congress since I believe 2004. It would basically amount to a government takeover of health care for essential services by expanding Medicare to cover everyone, and relegate private insurance to non-essentials. Health care providers would be required to be public, not for profit, in order to participate. In the bill for-profit institutions that converted would remain privately owned, which I suppose is a good thing. Now, having been under government-run healthcare for a good chunk of my life--TRICARE and VA--I can tell you that there will be problems.
When I first joined the Navy, if you weren't feeling too hot, you went to the clinic at 8:00am for sick call. The doctor saw you, made his diagnosis, and proceeded accordingly. The sick call system had been in place for literally hundreds of years; then, in '04 they did away with sick call. Now you had to make an appointment, and generally you didn't get a same day appointment. A buddy of mine was having a persistant headache. He made an appointment, but it was for a few days, maybe a week later. Well, several days later he got fed up and had someone drive him to a civilian hospital, where they ran the requisite tests and determined he was having a minor stroke. Lord knows what would have happened if he's waited for that appointment. And more recently, after an ECG found that I had some probable heart problems, I called to make an appointment. The soonest they had was nearly a month away--that was Feb. 28 and my appointment's tomorrow. Those are under government-run programs. Now, the TRICARE and the VA provides more comprehensive care than single-payer would, but, under the Kucinich bill, VA healthcare could be eliminated in favor of the government option. Indian Health Service would be eliminated, but TRICARE would remain untouched. I could see the Department of Health and Human Services turning the VA hospitals into national hospitals, but that could be somewhat far-fetched. But about the only way I could support single-payer, even a little, is if they left VA and IHS alone.
Oh, and another thing--the health care reform recently passed would expand the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps--doctors and nurses who, while not part of the military, are payed on the DOD payscale, wear Navy-style uniforms, and hold rank, just like the Navy, ensign to vice admiral--to create a reserve component and establish PHS Warrant Officers. What does expanding the size of the PHS Commissioned Corps have to do with health care reform? Sounds to me like a park-barrell project, but it may just be me.
Well, Mom, here's your comment! Sorry it's so long/
One of the problems with this bill is that it took them a year to pass it, and it wasn't because they were trying to work out the kinks, it was because they were too busy playing their partisan games. But it's like Jules said, bipartisanship was a foregone conclusion irregardless.
The CBO has said this is actually going to reduce the deficit. That's good, I'm all for defecit reduction, but I don't like the way they're doing it. For starters, they're cutting funding to Medicare. They have millions of people who depend on Medicare, and millions more that will depend on it soon, and they're going to cut funding. I would have rather they kept the funding as-is, or maybe even increased it. A lot of people on Medicare are on fixed incomes, and can't afford regular insurance--pre-existing condition or not--on their income, so in my opinion, reducing the Medicare funding is only going to hurt them more than it's going to help, at least in the short term. I admit that I'm actually kinda in favor of taxpayer subsidy of health insurance for those who can't afford it, if anything because, being on VA benefits, the taxpayers subsidize my healthcare, so who am I to complain, right?, but it's also because at least I know my tax dollars are going for something good and not, say, research on the behavior of moose sperm that's frozen and thawed out. . .but the Medicare cuts take effect before the government subsidies do. What are they going to do in the interim?
I also have a problem with the individual mandate. They're going to force everyone to have a minimum level of coverage. Now, again, that's where the government subsidies come in, and I know that there's exceptions for people who, even with subsidies, still can't afford it, and I also know that my VA healthcare automatically satisfies the minimum coverage requirement, but I oppose it on principle--who is the government to tell me or the people I know that they MUST do something, or face a fine? And the fine's not going to cap at $750. No, the cap in the penalty for not having health insurance is $750 multiplied by the cost of living increase from Calendar Year 1992--which was 3.7%, if I remember right, meaning the actual cap is more like $2,775.
And there's the matter of requiring employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance, or face a penalty. In the present economic environment a lot of those busimesses are doing good to meet payroll; throwing this on them may well spell bankruptcy. And I don't remember seeing anything in the bill about government helping to fund employer-sponsored coverage, although I could be wrong on that. I did try to read the bill, but at a couple thousand pages of congressional gibberish it's hard. . .
Of course, the individual mandate and employer mandate don't kick in until 2014. Who's to say the ecomony's going to improve by then? I sure as hell hope it has but with everything that's gone on economically it's a very real possibility that it could be 2014 or beyond before we fully recover. I'm not trying to sound pessimistic, I'm honestly just trying to look at reality.
That's the other thing--why do most of the changes have to take effect in 2014? Who not 2010, or 2011? They're waiting too long to put everything in effect. Yeah, okay, the budgets for 2011-2013 are already in the works. . .MODIFY THEM! I'm pretty sure there's a way to modify budget forecasts like that so that the stuff can take effect at least in 2011.
Now, I did my research on single-payer health care, specifically the Kucinich bill that's been introduced every Congress since I believe 2004. It would basically amount to a government takeover of health care for essential services by expanding Medicare to cover everyone, and relegate private insurance to non-essentials. Health care providers would be required to be public, not for profit, in order to participate. In the bill for-profit institutions that converted would remain privately owned, which I suppose is a good thing. Now, having been under government-run healthcare for a good chunk of my life--TRICARE and VA--I can tell you that there will be problems.
When I first joined the Navy, if you weren't feeling too hot, you went to the clinic at 8:00am for sick call. The doctor saw you, made his diagnosis, and proceeded accordingly. The sick call system had been in place for literally hundreds of years; then, in '04 they did away with sick call. Now you had to make an appointment, and generally you didn't get a same day appointment. A buddy of mine was having a persistant headache. He made an appointment, but it was for a few days, maybe a week later. Well, several days later he got fed up and had someone drive him to a civilian hospital, where they ran the requisite tests and determined he was having a minor stroke. Lord knows what would have happened if he's waited for that appointment. And more recently, after an ECG found that I had some probable heart problems, I called to make an appointment. The soonest they had was nearly a month away--that was Feb. 28 and my appointment's tomorrow. Those are under government-run programs. Now, the TRICARE and the VA provides more comprehensive care than single-payer would, but, under the Kucinich bill, VA healthcare could be eliminated in favor of the government option. Indian Health Service would be eliminated, but TRICARE would remain untouched. I could see the Department of Health and Human Services turning the VA hospitals into national hospitals, but that could be somewhat far-fetched. But about the only way I could support single-payer, even a little, is if they left VA and IHS alone.
Oh, and another thing--the health care reform recently passed would expand the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps--doctors and nurses who, while not part of the military, are payed on the DOD payscale, wear Navy-style uniforms, and hold rank, just like the Navy, ensign to vice admiral--to create a reserve component and establish PHS Warrant Officers. What does expanding the size of the PHS Commissioned Corps have to do with health care reform? Sounds to me like a park-barrell project, but it may just be me.
Well, Mom, here's your comment! Sorry it's so long/
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Canals, cemetaries, and convention centers, or: planes, trains, and automobiles. . .
AHA! The city of Jeffersonville has said that they can't really proceed with the canal project until they figure out if there really is, in fact, a Civil War-era cenetary underneath Colston Park, which is more or less in the path of the canal. I quoth from the Evening News (credit to David A. Mann):
"(Construction Solutions, LLC vice president Peggy)Duffy said the project could not proceed until the question of whether there is a Civil War-era cemetery beneath Colston Park, on Mulberry Street, is answered."
Well, let's see. . .on Mulberry Street, just south of Chestnut, next to the alley that goes to Colston Park, is a stone marker and a flagpole that tells the brief story of what was then Playsquare Park. It was established in the 1920's because the City Council at the time thought it would be better to hear the sounds of kids playing there than the sounds of soldiers at rest. (Not an exact quote). The last headstone was moved to Walnut Ridge Cemetary on Hamburg Pike. Back in the mid 1990's the park was renamed in honor of Raymond Colston, who was a past parks commissioner (truth be told I think he was the city's first.)
The park, and the adjacent baseball diamond, is located behind the old Rose Hill Elementary School. THat entire area is being eyeballed by the city as the site of a convention center. The convention center idea has been around a few months longer than the canal idea, and both have essentially been merged into one huge project. As I understand the project--the city's PowerPoint won't be up for a few more days--the canal would run along Mulberry on the east side of the convention center.
Anyways, back to what I was saying-->Ms. Duffy went on to say that if there WAS, in fact, a cemetary, their options would be 1)moving the cemetary; 2)moving the project away from the cemetary; or 3)incorporating the cemetary into the project itself. Now if Option 1 were chosen I would never recognize the city's existance ever again. I would stop reading the Evening News. I would drive the extra distance and go to work via New Albany instead of driving I-65 through Jeffersonville. I would petition Mapquest to remove it from their maps. If I ever needed to go to the hospital I would have the ambulance take me to Floyd Memorial--and I LOATHE FMH. Hell, I despise New Albany, but if they chose Option 1 I would embrace that miserable place.
I would certainly prefer Option 2. Heck, I'd prefer they not build a canal, but what do I know, right?
Now I have an idea about Option 3. Presently Jeffersonville has no veteran's memorial save the marker the Daughters of the American Revolution put in Warder Park eons ago. If they must insist on putting in the canal, why not turn Colston Park into a veteran's memorial park? (Uh-oh, that's not a bad idea!) In fact, I've had that idea for a few years now, and even have an idea of what the centerpiece memorial could look like. Maybe I ought to e-mail Mike Smith. . .
We'll see what happens. I hope this derails their whole operation, but if it doesn't and they decide to work this into the plan, they ought to call me. . .
"(Construction Solutions, LLC vice president Peggy)Duffy said the project could not proceed until the question of whether there is a Civil War-era cemetery beneath Colston Park, on Mulberry Street, is answered."
Well, let's see. . .on Mulberry Street, just south of Chestnut, next to the alley that goes to Colston Park, is a stone marker and a flagpole that tells the brief story of what was then Playsquare Park. It was established in the 1920's because the City Council at the time thought it would be better to hear the sounds of kids playing there than the sounds of soldiers at rest. (Not an exact quote). The last headstone was moved to Walnut Ridge Cemetary on Hamburg Pike. Back in the mid 1990's the park was renamed in honor of Raymond Colston, who was a past parks commissioner (truth be told I think he was the city's first.)
The park, and the adjacent baseball diamond, is located behind the old Rose Hill Elementary School. THat entire area is being eyeballed by the city as the site of a convention center. The convention center idea has been around a few months longer than the canal idea, and both have essentially been merged into one huge project. As I understand the project--the city's PowerPoint won't be up for a few more days--the canal would run along Mulberry on the east side of the convention center.
Anyways, back to what I was saying-->Ms. Duffy went on to say that if there WAS, in fact, a cemetary, their options would be 1)moving the cemetary; 2)moving the project away from the cemetary; or 3)incorporating the cemetary into the project itself. Now if Option 1 were chosen I would never recognize the city's existance ever again. I would stop reading the Evening News. I would drive the extra distance and go to work via New Albany instead of driving I-65 through Jeffersonville. I would petition Mapquest to remove it from their maps. If I ever needed to go to the hospital I would have the ambulance take me to Floyd Memorial--and I LOATHE FMH. Hell, I despise New Albany, but if they chose Option 1 I would embrace that miserable place.
I would certainly prefer Option 2. Heck, I'd prefer they not build a canal, but what do I know, right?
Now I have an idea about Option 3. Presently Jeffersonville has no veteran's memorial save the marker the Daughters of the American Revolution put in Warder Park eons ago. If they must insist on putting in the canal, why not turn Colston Park into a veteran's memorial park? (Uh-oh, that's not a bad idea!) In fact, I've had that idea for a few years now, and even have an idea of what the centerpiece memorial could look like. Maybe I ought to e-mail Mike Smith. . .
We'll see what happens. I hope this derails their whole operation, but if it doesn't and they decide to work this into the plan, they ought to call me. . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
